sugar/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Activity

rcu: Add warning to ensure rcu_seq_done_exact() is working

Browse Source 
The previous patch improved the rcu_seq_done_exact() function by adding
a meaningful constant for the guardband.

Ensure that this is working for the future by a quick check during
rcu_gp_init().

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joel Fernandes
2025-03-24 09:29:26 -04:00
parent 9c94c5ad39
commit 4aa6e94cf9
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
kernel/rcu/tree.c
View File

@@ -1798,6 +1798,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool rcu_gp_init(void)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root();
bool start_new_poll;
unsigned long old_gp_seq;
WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity, jiffies);
raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
@@ -1825,7 +1826,12 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool rcu_gp_init(void)
*/
start_new_poll = rcu_sr_normal_gp_init();
/* Record GP times before starting GP, hence rcu_seq_start(). */
old_gp_seq = rcu_state.gp_seq;
rcu_seq_start(&rcu_state.gp_seq);
/* Ensure that rcu_seq_done_exact() guardband doesn't give false positives. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) &&
rcu_seq_done_exact(&old_gp_seq, rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.gp_seq)));
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.gp_seq);
trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("start"));
rcu_poll_gp_seq_start(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_snap);