xfs: Use folio_next_pos()
This is one instruction more efficient than open-coding folio_pos() + folio_size(). It's the equivalent of (x + y) << z rather than x << z + y << z. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251024170822.1427218-10-willy@infradead.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Christian Brauner
parent
2408900d40
commit
ac0a11113d
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ xfarray_sort_scan(
|
||||
si->first_folio_idx = xfarray_idx(si->array,
|
||||
folio_pos(si->folio) + si->array->obj_size - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
next_pos = folio_pos(si->folio) + folio_size(si->folio);
|
||||
next_pos = folio_next_pos(si->folio);
|
||||
si->last_folio_idx = xfarray_idx(si->array, next_pos - 1);
|
||||
if (xfarray_pos(si->array, si->last_folio_idx + 1) > next_pos)
|
||||
si->last_folio_idx--;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ xfs_discard_folio(
|
||||
* folio itself and not the start offset that is passed in.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, pos,
|
||||
folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio), NULL);
|
||||
folio_next_pos(folio), NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user