Clean up the pseries scanlog driver's use of procfs:
(1) Don't need to save the proc_dir_entry pointer as we have the filename to
remove with.
(2) Save the scan log buffer pointer in a static variable (there is only one
of it) and don't save it in the PDE (which doesn't have a destructor).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Clean up some of the problems with the rtas_flash driver:
(1) It shouldn't fiddle with the internals of the procfs filesystem (altering
pde->count).
(2) If pid namespaces are in effect, then you can get multiple inodes
connected to a single pde, thereby rendering the pde->count > 2 test
useless.
(3) The pde->count fudging doesn't work for forked, dup'd or cloned file
descriptors, so add static mutexes and use them to wrap access to the
driver through read, write and release methods.
(4) The driver can only handle one device, so allocate most of the data
previously attached to the pde->data as static variables instead (though
allocate the validation data buffer with kmalloc).
(5) We don't need to save the pde pointers as long as we have the filenames
available for removal.
(6) Don't try to multiplex what the update file read method does based on the
filename. Instead provide separate file ops and split the function.
Whilst we're at it, tabulate the procfile information and loop through it when
creating or destroying them rather than manually coding each one.
[Folded fixes from Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use remove_proc_subtree() rather than remove_proc_entry() to remove a
minor-specific drm proc directory and all its children.
Things could theoretically be improved by storing the drm_minor pointer in the
minor-specific dir proc_dir_entry struct data and then scrapping the list of
proc files - but that's shared with the debugfs interface where you can't do
that, so I don't see an easy way of doing it.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use minor->index to label things, not the name field from the proc_dir_entry
of the /proc/dwm/<minor>/ directory.
Also, use "%u" not "%d" to render the value and use a 12-byte buffer in which
to render the integer, not a 16-byte buffer. The longest string an unsigned
int can give you is 10 chars (4294967295) plus a NUL, so round up to 12 as the
stack is likely to be 4- or 8-byte aligned.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't access the proc_dir_entry in ReiserFS's r_open(), r_start() r_show()
procfs interface functions.
ReiserFS stores the ->show() method pointer in PDE->data and the super_block
pointer in PDE->parent->data. This isn't changing.
Currently, ReiserFS passes the PDE pointer into seq_file::private from
r_open() so that r_start() and r_show() can then access it. Instead, use
seq_open_private() to allocate a two-pointer struct that's passed through
seq_file::private and put the ->show() method and the sb pointers in there.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Supply an accessor function for getting the private data from the parent
proc_dir_entry struct of the proc_dir_entry struct associated with an inode.
ReiserFS, for instance, stores the super_block pointer in the proc directory
it makes for that super_block, and a pointer to the respective seq_file show
function in each of the proc files in that directory.
This allows a reduction in the number of file_operations structs, open
functions and seq_operations structs required. The problem otherwise is that
each show function requires two pieces of data but only has storage for one
per PDE (and this has no release function).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: Jerry Chuang <jerry-chuang@realtek.com>
cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
cc: YAMANE Toshiaki <yamanetoshi@gmail.com>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Move PDE_NET() to fs/proc/proc_net.c as that's where the only user is.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Uninline pid_delete_dentry() as it's only used by three function pointers.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Delete create_proc_read_entry() as it no longer has any users.
Also delete read_proc_t, write_proc_t, the read_proc member of the
proc_dir_entry struct and the support functions that use them. This saves a
pointer for every PDE allocated.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There's no need to keep this entry in proc, it is PM
related debug only entry. Let's move it into debugfs.
Based on an earlier patch David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
to use seq_printf and to update to use create_proc_read_entry().
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use
proc_create_data() and seq_file instead. Whilst we're at it, reduce the
number of show functions where we can share them.
Note: proc_get_stats_ap() should probably use seq_file iteration rather than
list_for_each_entry().
Further note: There appears to be a lot of locking missing in this file to
defend against concurrent access by the driver doing normal operations.
Notably, ieee->network_list traversal and RWCAM/RCAMO command/response access.
Further, do any of the registers read have side effects upon reading?
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jerry Chuang <jerry-chuang@realtek.com>
cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Mark create_proc_read_entry deprecated. proc_create[_data]() should be used
instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
